Legal Opinion

Burt v. Hœttinger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1867PublishedCited by 18 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— This was a proceeding supplementary to execution, under the statute, commenced by Uoettinger against Alphonso Burt. An 'affidavit was filed on behalf of Uoettinger, stating that on the 7th day of October, 1865, Uoettinger recovered a judgment against Alphonso Burt, in the Marion Common Pleas, for the sum of $423 21; that an execution had been issued thereon, and that said Burt had filed with the proper officer a sworn statement that ho was not worth the sum fixed bylaw as free from execution; that the affiant was informed and believed that said Burt was then a resident of .Marion county,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Figg v. SnookIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Witherow v. HigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Scott v. Indianapolis Wagon WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. McMahan v. WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. HowesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Adams v. MerrillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Burkett v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API