Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

The Formula Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2008No. C058894PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

In this case we decide that the California us pendens statutes, Code of Civil Procedure sections 405 to 405.61, 1 do not authorize recording a notice of litigation that is pending in the courts of another state. The Formula Inc., a Florida corporation, filed an action in Florida alleging a right to compel construction and sale to it of condominium units located in Mono County, California. The Formula then recorded a notice of the Florida action, purportedly under section 405.20, 2 in the office of the recorder of Mono County. Real parties in interest iStar Financial Inc.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Alcala v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Urez Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Malcolm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Manhattan Loft, LLC v. Mercury Liquors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Boca Petroco, Inc. v. Petroleum Realty IISupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. People v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Conrad v. WilkinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API