Legal Opinion
Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 19, 2012No. C.A. 05-023-RGAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANDREWS, District Judge:
Plaintiff Dow Chemical Canada, Inc. brings this supplemental motion for summary judgment (D.I. 481) in order to prove up damages on its contract claim against *352Defendant HRD Corporation. A previous order of this Court (D.I. 444) granted Dow’s motion for summary judgment and established HRD’s breach of contract, but did not determine Dow’s damages. This opinion will determine Dow’s claims for damages.
BACKGROUND
On July 1, 2002, Dow and HRD entered into two contracts: the Joint Development Agreement (“JDA”) and the Supply Agreement. (D.I. 483, Exhs. 1,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Delaware Bay Surgical Services, P.A. v. SwierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Lipson v. Anesthesia Services, P.A.Superior Court of Delaware · 2001
- Brazen v. Bell Atlantic Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- W & G Seaford Associates, L.P. v. Eastern Shore Markets, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Lee Builders v. WellsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smart Sand, Inc. v. US Well Services LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021