Legal Opinion
Lee Builders v. Wells
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided March 17, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 200PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
103 A.2d 918 (1954)
LEE BUILDERS, Inc.
v.
WELLS et al.
Civ. A. No. 200.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
March 17, 1954.
Albert W. James and H. James Conaway, Jr. (of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams), Wilmington, for plaintiff.
Daniel O. Hastings and Clarence W. Taylor (of Hastings, Stockly & Walz), Wilmington, for defendants.
BRAMHALL, Vice Chancellor.
This suit has been remanded to this court by the supreme court for the purpose of determining defendants' counterclaim for damages. More complete statements of the essential facts will be found in the opinion of the supreme court, Wells v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wells v. Lee Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- In re the Receivership of D. Ross & Son, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1915
- Lee Builders, Inc. v. WellsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Lee Builders, Inc. v. WellsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- Delaware Bay Surgical Services, P.A. v. SwierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Brazen v. Bell Atlantic Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Tri-Plex Security Alarm SystemsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1992
- Gilbane Building Co. v. Nemours FoundationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.