Legal Opinion

Brazen v. Bell Atlantic Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 27, 1997No. 130, 1997PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal, the issues facing the Court surround the question of whether a two-tiered $550 million termination fee in a merger agreement is a valid liquidated damages provision or whether the termination fee was an invalid penalty and tended improperly to coerce stockholders into voting for the merger.

Although there are judgmental aspects involved in the traditional liquidated damages analysis applicable here, we do not apply the business judgment rule as such. We hold that the termination fee should be analyzed as a liquidated damages provision because the merger…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  4. Williams v. GeierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. Arnold v. Society for Sayings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jkc Holding Company Llc v. Washington Sports Ventures, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. Solomon v. ArmstrongCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
  4. In Re General Motors Class H Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
  5. Blackstone Medical, Inc. D/B/A Orthofix Spinal Implants v. Phoenix Surgicals, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API