Legal Opinion
L-3 Communications Eotech, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 18, 2009No. 08-871 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
This post-award bid protest is before the court on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record filed under Rule 52.1(c) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC).2 L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc. (EOTech) challenges the December 5, 2008 modification to Contract No. W15QKN-06-C-0010 (the “old” contract). AR at 47-56. The contract modification, perhaps best described as a sole source bridge contract, would allow the United States Army Joint Munitions and Lethality Contracting Center (the Army) to procure from Aimpoint, Inc. (Aimpoint) 85,134…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Protect Lake Pleasant, LLC v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Cherokee Nation Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Ahtna Logistics LLC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.