Cherokee Nation Technologies, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Patricia E. Campbell-Smith, Chief Judge
Before the court, in this bid protest action, is plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons that follow, the court hereby GRANTS, in part, plaintiffs motion. 2
I. Background
On March 6, 2014, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) awarded an information technology services contract to Cherokee Nation Technologies, LLC (Cherokee), in the amount of $4,459,331.00, for a six-month base period and four one-year option periods. The contract was to begin on April 1, 2014. The procurement was a Buy Indian…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Myers Investigative and Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Diaz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Universal Protection Service, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016