L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*659OPINION
BUSH, Judge.
This pre-award bid protest is before the court on Defendant’s Motion for Relief from Stay (Def.’s Mot.), filed May 5, 2009, and Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce the Court’s Injunction (PL’s Mot.), filed May 22, 2009. The court also has before it the administrative record (AR), as supplemented on January 22, 2009, May 26, 2009 and May 27, 2009. Although the titles of the motions before the court are not fully indicative of their dispositive nature, the parties and the court agreed to treat these motions as cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record that address the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Jordan Pond Company, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Mil-Mar Century Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- The McVey Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Brooks Range Contract Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.