In Re the Marriage of Kelm
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
We granted certiorari in In re Marriage of Kelm, 878 P.2d 34 (Colo.App.1994), to review whether the trial court erred in awarding wife: (1) a portion of husband’s retirement benefits attributable to his employment after divorce; (2) all benefits from her pension plan; and (3) a lump-sum distribution of contributions to the husband’s pension plan should he die prior to retirement.1 The court of appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. We now hold that the trial court abused its discretion and affirm in part and reverse in part the decision of the court of appeals. We return the case with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Marriage of GalloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- In re the Marriage of GrubbSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- In Re the Marriage of HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of KelmColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stewart ex rel. Stewart v. RiceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- In Re the Marriage of HeupelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Forshee v. ForsheeAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re the Marriage of TagenColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- McGee v. McGeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.