Legal Opinion

Forshee v. Forshee

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 2006No. S-11751PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This property division appeal arises from the divoree of Jack and Shan Forshee. Jack argues that the superior court erred in its identification and valuation of several marital assets and Habilities, including the marital residence, a lot used by Jack to store business supplies, an investment property in Washington State, retirement benefits originally held by Shan, and a list of several business debts. Jack alleges that he was unable to present adequate evidence because he lacked legal representation at trial, and he claims that the superior court erred in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moffitt v. MoffittAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Nass v. SeatonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Ledgends, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Partridge v. PartridgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Diblik v. MarcyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. McLaren v. McLarenAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Daggett v. FeeneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API