Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Seely

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1974No. Civ. 13635PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARTER, J. *

Plaintiff taxpayers appeal after a court trial from a judgment upholding the validity of a contract entered into between the County of Butte and intervener Jerome E. Warren for the rendition of legal services by Warren to certain indigent defendants in criminal matters, indigent juveniles and conservatees in need of and entitled to legal assistance at public expense. The judgment further ordered the defendant, F. H. Seely, Jr., as Auditor of Butte County to pay warrants to Warren pursuant to the contract.

Plaintiffs contend on appeal:

1. Defendant board of supervisors lacked…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Dominguez v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API