Legal Opinion

In Re Hough

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1944No. Crim. 4500PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The petitioner seeks his release from the custody of the warden of the State Prison at San Quentin after his pleas of guilty to two counts of murder upon which the death sentence was pronounced against him.

The ground upon which his petition for release is based is that the judgments of conviction are illegal and are violative of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and deprive petitioner of his life without due process of law. His main complaint is that his pleas of guilty were secured and induced by improper and illegal means, which render hi's conviction void…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SchwarzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. GottliebCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. People v. AseltineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API