Legal Opinion

State v. Wold

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 9, 1991No. CR0-0156-BH; CA A64509PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant entered a plea of guilty of assault in the fourth degree, a misdemeanor. ORS 163.160(1)(a). He was charged by information with having committed the assault on January 7, 1990. He seeks modification of the two-day jail sentence that he received as a condition of probation. We remand for resentencing.

Defendant argues that the trial court exceeded its statutory authority in imposing the condition of probation because, after the 1989 amendments to ORS 137.540(2), the only offenses committed on or after November 1, 1989, for which jail may be imposed are felonies. Or Laws 1989, ch 790, §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SchwabCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Portland Adventist Medical Center v. SheffieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. OaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. OaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API