Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1992No. 91 CR 0423; CA A70392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 138.040; ORS 138.053. We affirm the conviction without discussion but remand for resentencing.

Defendant assigns two errors regarding his sentence. First, he argues that the trial court exceeded its statutory-authority in both sentencing him and placing him on probation in the same sentencing order. The trial court imposed a jail sentence of 30 days with 27 days suspended and — as part of the same order — placed defendant on probation for 36 months with conditions. Neither imposition nor execution of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. VasbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State v. SchwabCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API