Legal Opinion

Nesbit v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided June 6, 2003No. GDTC-AA-02-150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUERNSEY, Chief Justice.

On July 31, 2002, there appeared in the Police Log of the Day newspaper a report that the Plaintiff herein, Dereck Nesbit, was charged with two counts of first-degree failure to appear in Court. On this basis, the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Commission scheduled a Show Cause Hearing for August 17, 2002. Notice was sent to Mr. Nesbit at 73 Oneco Avenue, Norwich, CT 06340 by certified mail on August 16, 2002, and contained the warning that “failure to appear for the scheduled hearing will result in the suspension of [his] license.” Commission Exhibit 1.

This notice was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Albert Mendel & Son, Inc. v. KroghConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Ager v. Office of Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
  4. La Pietra v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
  5. Gruntz v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Izbicki v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2010
  2. Marson v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API