Gruntz v. Office of the Director of Regulations
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Judge.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Kevin Gruntz, from a final decision of the Office of the Director of Regulation, the Director of Regulation, revoking the plaintiffs gaming license. The plaintiff claims aggrievement in that he wasn’t given enough time to deal with the California warrant and the charges for the Connecticut arrest have been cleared. The appeal is taken pursuant to Mohegan Tribal Ordinance (MTO) 95-6.
I. JURISDICTION
MTO 95-6 contains several provisions relevant to this appeal. Sec. 1(a) provides that the Agency includes the Office of the Director of Regulation as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- La Pietra v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
- Nesbit v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
- Brown v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003