Legal Opinion

Gruntz v. Office of the Director of Regulations

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided October 30, 2002No. GDTC-AA-02-121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Kevin Gruntz, from a final decision of the Office of the Director of Regulation, the Director of Regulation, revoking the plaintiffs gaming license. The plaintiff claims aggrievement in that he wasn’t given enough time to deal with the California warrant and the charges for the Connecticut arrest have been cleared. The appeal is taken pursuant to Mohegan Tribal Ordinance (MTO) 95-6.

I. JURISDICTION

MTO 95-6 contains several provisions relevant to this appeal. Sec. 1(a) provides that the Agency includes the Office of the Director of Regulation as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Department of Public Safety v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Pietra v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
  2. Nesbit v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
  3. Brown v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API