Legal Opinion

Coddington v. City of Lewiston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1974No. 11453PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

This is an action for loss of consortium. On March 21, 1971, the plaintiff-appellant’s husband, Earl Coddington was injured when a trench he was excavating caved in and buried him. At the time of the accident, Earl Coddington was employed by the defendant-respondent, the City of Lewis-ton, and he received workmen’s compensation benefits for his injuries. On September 8, 1972, the appellant lodged a notice of claim with Lewiston, and on October 3, 1972, the appellant filed an action alleging that as a result of the accident and injuries to her husband, she had suffered a loss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Arrington Construction CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Summers v. Western Idaho Potato Processing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Izquierdo v. Cities Service Oil Co. (Pa.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. Rush v. G-K MacHinery Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. McKellar v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Wright v. Action Vending Company, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Williams v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Gardner v. HollifieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API