Legal Opinion

Boone v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 29, 1947No. C. D. 1068PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This action arises by way of protest filed by the plaintiff against the classification by the collector at the port of San Diego of a carload of barley bran as a nonenumerated manufactured article and his assessment of duty thereon at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1658 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is dutiable at 6 per centum’ ad valorem under paragraph 73Ó, by virtue of the trade agreement with Canada, T. D. 49752, as byproduct feeds obtained in milling wheat or other cereals, or as a mixed feed at the same rate, as provided in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James Richardson & Sons, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. United States v. International Milling Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Ricks v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maywood Chemical Works Monsanto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Boone v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. Fischer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. United States v. BooneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API