Legal Opinion

Yeroshefsky v. Unisys Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 24, 1997No. Civil PJM 95-1607PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs Paul Yeroshefsky and Susan Lorrain Yeroshefsky, his wife, sue Unisys Corporation as successor to Burroughs Corporation. Plaintiffs claim that Paul Yero-shefsky, while employed by the U.S. Postal Service (variously, “USPS” or “Service”), used certain keyboard equipment manufactured, designed, and distributed by Burroughs that caused him repetitive stress injury. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on the basis of the government contractor defense. Having considered the pleadings and the entire record, the Court will grant…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Pritchett v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quiles v. Sikorsky AircraftDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. Gauthreaux v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  3. Stilwell v. General Railway Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. Raytheon Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  5. Silverstein v. Northrop Grumman Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API