Legal Opinion
Gauthreaux v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided October 16, 2009No. Civil Action 2:08cv387, 2:08cv615PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge.
Before the Court are the cross Motions for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of Justin Gauthreaux (“Plaintiff’) and Wiggins Lift Co., Inc. (“Wiggins”). Having carefully reviewed the parties’ pleadings, the Court finds that this matter is now ripe for judicial determination. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED and Defendant Wiggins Motion is GRANTED.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 18, 2008, Plaintiff Justin Gauthreaux (“Plaintiff’) filed Civil Action No.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Gottlieb v. C R Bard IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021