Legal Opinion

MacK Financial Corp. v. Harnett Transfer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1979No. 7826DC857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in allowing plaintiffs witness John Sumner to testify on direct, and the defendant’s witness George Hodges to testify on cross-examination, about a negotiation for the purchase by defendant of two used trucks from Brockway. According to the testimony, Hodges suggested that when the financing for the purchase of the trucks was being arranged, that Sumner raise the price of each of the trucks by $2,000 and apply the extra $4,000 from the sale against the repair bill for the Kenworth truck. Defendant contends that this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Searcy Ex Rel. Schiro v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. David G. Allen Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Bullock v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marley v. GraperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Gee v. Chattahoochee Tractor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Bond Park Truck Service, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Jones v. AllredCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API