Bond Park Truck Service, Inc. v. Hill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
Defendant contends that the court erred by admitting plaintiffs Exhibit One into evidence. Plaintiff’s Exhibit Number One, which consisted of itemized statements of account for materials supplied and labor performed by plaintiff upon defendant’s truck, was not verified. Therefore it was not admissible pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8-45 which reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
In any actions instituted in any court of this State upon an account for goods sold and delivered, . . . for services rendered, or labor performed, ... a verified itemized statement of such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Overman v. Gibson Products Co. of Thomasville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Dairy & Ice Cream Supply Co. v. Gastonia Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Woodard v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- MacK Financial Corp. v. Harnett Transfer, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Santora, McKay & Ranieri v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Vanlandingham v. Northeastern Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983