Legal Opinion
Gennell v FedEx Corp et al
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 19, 2014No. 05-cv-145-PBPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Gennell v FedEx Corp et al 05-cv-145-PB 3/19/14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Robert Gennell, Jr., et al v. Case No. 05-cv-145-PB Opinion No. 2 014 DNH 05 6 FedEx Co r p ., et al MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The plaintiffs in this long-running dispute are a class of drivers based in New Hampshire who worked for defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. ("FedEx") ^ Plaintiffs claim, among other things, that they are entitled to be reimbursed for work- related expenses pursuant to section 275:57(1) of the New Hampshire Revised Statutes. This Memorandum and Order…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Carroll v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Platten v. HG Bermuda Exempted Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.