State v. Wamala
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The defendant, Severine Wamala, appeals his conviction of eleven counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault (AFSA). See RSA 632-A-.2 (2007) (amended 2008). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (Lynn, C.J.) erroneously: (1) allowed the State to introduce evidence of the victim’s “time capsule,” a school project in which she had written that she and the defendant had had sex; (2) denied his counsel’s request to voir dire prospective jurors individually pursuant to RSA 500-A:12-a (Supp. 2008); and (3) permitted the State to impeach the victim’s sisters with their prior inconsistent…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. NightingaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State v. CarpenterNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. OakesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.