Legal Opinion

State v. Wamala

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 17, 2009No. 2007-863PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Severine Wamala, appeals his conviction of eleven counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault (AFSA). See RSA 632-A-.2 (2007) (amended 2008). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (Lynn, C.J.) erroneously: (1) allowed the State to introduce evidence of the victim’s “time capsule,” a school project in which she had written that she and the defendant had had sex; (2) denied his counsel’s request to voir dire prospective jurors individually pursuant to RSA 500-A:12-a (Supp. 2008); and (3) permitted the State to impeach the victim’s sisters with their prior inconsistent…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. NightingaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  4. State v. CarpenterNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. OakesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API