Marky Investment, Inc. v. Arnezeder
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
Sub. (2) of sec. 263.15, Stats., expressly authorizes demurrers to cross complaints, and sub. (7) of sec. 263.06 states as one of the permissible grounds for demurrer “that the action was not commenced within the time limited by law.” Furthermore, it is proper to demur on this ground when it appears from the face of the pleading attacked that the opposing party has been in adverse possession of the subject real property for the limitation period. Gurr v. Gurr (1944), 198 Ga. 493, 32 S. E. (2d) 507; Humbert v. Trinity Church (1838), 7 Paige Ch. (N. Y.) 195, affirmed (1840), 24 Wend. (N. Y.)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- McCann v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- McMillan v. WehleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Peters v. KellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Ellington v. . EllingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goerke v. VojvodichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Roeckl v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Harwick v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Lott v. Muldoon Road Baptist Church, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Hertz Corp. v. Red Rooster Cheese Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.