Legal Opinion

Roeckl v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1994No. S-5622PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before MOORE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ., and BRYNER, J. Pro Tern. * BRYNER, Justice, Pro Tern.

This appeal by Anton Roeckl from the superior court’s order of summary judgment in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) requires us to determine whether a conveyance of real property to a grantee under an assumed business name is barred under Alaska law. We conclude that such a conveyance is permissible in the absence of actual fraud, and, accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment entered below.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. Judgments against Ferche and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Bruce Dunn, Richard Austin Mandeville, Joseph Harvey Zeligs, Darold Lanier Milligan, Richard Lee ShinafeltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Moffat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Kreuter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. Charles E. Leggett and John Henry EleveldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  5. Blumenstein v. Phillips Insurance Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. ABC TOWINGCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  4. Credit Associates of Maui, Ltd. v. CarlbomHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API