Roeckl v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before MOORE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ., and BRYNER, J. Pro Tern. * BRYNER, Justice, Pro Tern.
This appeal by Anton Roeckl from the superior court’s order of summary judgment in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) requires us to determine whether a conveyance of real property to a grantee under an assumed business name is barred under Alaska law. We conclude that such a conveyance is permissible in the absence of actual fraud, and, accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment entered below.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Judgments against Ferche and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Bruce Dunn, Richard Austin Mandeville, Joseph Harvey Zeligs, Darold Lanier Milligan, Richard Lee ShinafeltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Moffat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kreuter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Charles E. Leggett and John Henry EleveldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Blumenstein v. Phillips Insurance Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Olsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ABC TOWINGCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
- Credit Associates of Maui, Ltd. v. CarlbomHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2002
- Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.