Legal Opinion

Hertz Corp. v. Red Rooster Cheese Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1972No. 166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The challenge on appeal is to the trial court’s sustaining in part the demurrer of plaintiff to the counterclaim of defendant. The trial court sustained the demurrer to one of five items of damage claimed in the counterclaim, relying upon a contract provision incorporated in plaintiff’s complaint.

There are two things wrong with what the trial court did.(1) A demurrer to a counterclaim, asserting that the counterclaim does not state a cause of action, is a challenge of the legal sufficiency on its face of such counterclaim. It is directed toward errors and omissions appearing on the face of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northwestern Motor Car, Inc. v. PopeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Spencer Co-operative Live Stock Shipping Ass'n v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Trade Press Publishing Co. v. Milwaukee Typographical Union No. 23Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Boek v. WagnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schweiger v. Loewi & Co., IncorporatedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. John v. JohnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Theune v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Draeger v. John Lubotsky Motor Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Revival Center Tabernacle of Battle Creek v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API