Legal Opinion

People v. Harrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1970No. Crim. 5394PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PIERCE, P. J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of attempted first degree robbery and of first degree burglary. The offenses were held to comprise an indivisible transaction and sentence imposed only for the latter offense, first degree burglary. The judgment included the recital that defendant had been charged with and was found to have been armed with a deadly weapon at the time of commission'of the offense, or a concealed deadly weapon at the time of his arrest within the meaning of Penal Code sections 969c and 3024.

Twelve contentions are submitted on appeal. 1

For reasons stated…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. NilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. NajeraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. WhalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. People v. WatersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Hoffman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API