Hoffman v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.
Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent any further proceedings to determine whether he is a mentally disordered sex offender (MDSO). He contends no statutory authorization exists for the procedures the trial court has followed here, and also, principles analogous to the defense of former jeopardy preclude redetermination of his MDSO status because he was found not to be an MDSO shortly before these proceedings were begun.
Petitioner was originally found to be an MDSO in March of 1973 after he pled guilty to two counts of forcible rape, firearm allegation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. BurnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re CandelarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. FeagleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoffman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. Curiel CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014