People v. Najera
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
Defendant was charged with robbery (Pen. Code, § 211); the information alleged that he was “armed with a deadly weapon, to-wit, a gun” during the offense. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the robbery charge and found that defendant was armed with a gun at the time the robbery occurred. The judgment recites that defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree and states that “Defendant was armed with a .22 Caliber Revolver.” Defendant appeals, asserting various errors. He also contends that the judgment of conviction should be modified to provide that Penal Code…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. WimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. ManceboCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.