Legal Opinion

People v. Najera

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1972No. Crim. 16216PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

Defendant was charged with robbery (Pen. Code, § 211); the information alleged that he was “armed with a deadly weapon, to-wit, a gun” during the offense. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on the robbery charge and found that defendant was armed with a gun at the time the robbery occurred. The judgment recites that defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree and states that “Defendant was armed with a .22 Caliber Revolver.” Defendant appeals, asserting various errors. He also contends that the judgment of conviction should be modified to provide that Penal Code…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. WimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. ManceboCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API