Legal Opinion

Box v. Young

California Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 14267PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Appeal from judgment on the pleadings in favor of plaintiffs. The question involved is correctly stated by the appellants in the following language: “When a recall petition, sufficient in all respects, has been filed with the secretary of the board of directors of an irrigation district, and after the secretary has made complete examination, but before his certificate is made or said certificate and petition presented to the board of directors, the major portion of said petition is stolen and lost, does such loss divest the secretary of authority to make his certificate and divest the board…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yolo v. Modesto Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re the Estate of HeywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hibernia Savings and Loan Soc. v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Board of Directors of Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Southern Sierras Power Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API