Legal Opinion

Southern Sierras Power Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1936No. 7970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner for rehearing seeks opportunity to present the argument that the Imperial Irrigation District is not a “political subdivision” of the State of California and cites and relies upon Wood v. Imperial Irrigation District, 216 Cal. 748, at page 753, 17 P.(2d) 128, 130, where the court states in the course of its reasoning to its decision that “an irrigation district is not a political subdivision of the state or county, or a political subsidiary at all.” Compare with the later case of Box v. Young, 219 Cal. 243, 26 P.(2d) 290.

If the contention of the petitioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Box v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dist.District Court, S.D. California · 1937
  2. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API