In Re the Estate of Heywood
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss appeals from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to set aside a probate homestead, or exempt personal property, or to grant a family allowance. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Motion to dismiss three several appeals for want of prosecution.
On November 18, 1905, in the Estate of Franklin Heywood, deceased, the superior court made three orders whereby it denied the respective applications of Agnes B. Heywood, widow of said deceased, to have a probate homestead set apart to her, to have the exempt personal property set off, and for a family allowance. There were three separate petitions, but all of them were tried together. From each of these orders the widow appealed to this court. The appeals were perfected on January 15, 1906. No transcript on either appeal has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Will of WarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Leach v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Shipman v. UnangstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Gray v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Carter v. WasteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Stevens v. ChapinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
- Alden v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.