Legal Opinion

Valente v. Sofamor, S.N.C.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 29, 1999No. 96-C-1327PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

GOODSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The plaintiffs, who received orthopedic bone screws in the course of spinal surgery, bring this action against the follow ing bone screw designer's, manufacturers, promoters, distributors and sellers — Sofa-mor, S.N.C; Sofamor Danek Group, Incorporated; and Danek Medical, Incorporated — alleging that the defendants’ bone screws were defective and caused the plaintiffs to sustain injuries. This case is one of many filed across the United States against bone screw designers, manufacturers, promoters, distributors, and sellers and was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Novell v. MigliaccioWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. Minisan v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  4. Alexander v. Smith & Nephew, P.L.C.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
  5. Menges v. Depuy Motech, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API