O'DONNELL v. McLoughlin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Jones,
This litigation eventuated from a partnership between the plaintiff and the defendant. The facts essential to an understanding of the question presented by this appeal are as follows.
On November 14, 1950, O’Donnell, the plaintiff, and McLoughlin, the defendant, entered into formal written articles of partnership for the conduct of a cooperage business in Philadelphia under the firm name of Mc-Loughlin Bros. As provided by the articles, the partnership was to continue until December 31, 1951, and, thereafter, from year to year “subject to dissolution at the end of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nippon Ki-Ito Kaisha, Ltd. v. Ewing-Thomas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Gibbs's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Kaufmann v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Zuback v. BakmazSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Underdown v. UnderdownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Murphy & Slota v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Rahemtulla v. HassamDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Abbott v. Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Napoli v. DomnitchNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- LaBrum & Doak, LLP v. Bechtle (In Re LaBrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.