Pittsburgh Railways Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a New York Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered for the defendant in a contract case. The parties are in federal court by reason of diversity only; the plaintiff is a Pennsylvania corporation and the defendant a New York corporation. The trial judge, in an opinion which carefully analyzed the transactions between the parties, found as a fact that there was “no genuine issue as to any material facts” and, therefore, entered summary judgment.
It should be added, also, that the plaintiff in his brief concedes that “ * * * there is no dispute as to the facts and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Commonwealth v. Henry W. Horst Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Daniels Co., Contractors, Inc. v. NevlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ebasco Services Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Capitol Bus Co. v. Blue Bird Coach Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Brock v. Dow Chemical U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- L. O. Koven & Brother, Inc. v. Local Union No. 5767, United SteelworkersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- Spurr v. Acme Steel Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.