Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Henry W. Horst Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1950No. Appeal, No. 207PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This, action in assumpsit ivas brought in the name of the Commonwealth to the use of Joseph Herzog', a partnership, against Henry W. Horst Company, a construction engineering firm employed by the Commonwealth, and its surety, the Maryland Casualty Company, to recover $7,642.60 due under an excavation and hauling contract. Defendants answered and by way of counterclaim averred that a material change had occurred when the excavation operations were shifted from one site to another and, by the terms of the contract, this necessitated a readjustment of the amount due.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moorre v. Stevens Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Braddock Wire Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Wiegand v. WiegandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Baldwin v. MagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Shafer v. SensemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barium Steel Corp. v. WileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Brookbank v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Warren M. Wilson v. Homestead Valve Manufacturing Company. Appeal of Warren M. Wilson. Appeal of Homestead Valve Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. Home Builders of Mercer County, Inc. v. Dellwood Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Daniels v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API