Legal Opinion
Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 8, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
McGLYNN, District Judge.
This case is the third action brought by horse owners and/or trainers to challenge Rule 9.15 of the Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission (“Commission”) which sets fees to be paid to jockeys who ride at racetracks in the Commonwealth. The first case was brought in late 1978 in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania by the Pennsylvania Division of the Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association (“HBPA”) 1 , one of the plaintiffs in the instant action, and other horse owners and trainers claiming, inter alia, that the Commission lacked authority…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fisher Foods, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
- United States v. North Dakota Hospital Ass'nDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1986
- Ajax Aluminum, Inc. v. Goodwill Industries of Muskegon CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
- Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Ass'n, Inc., Pennsylvania Div. v. Pennsylvania Horse Racing Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982