Ajax Aluminum, Inc. v. Goodwill Industries of Muskegon County
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE MOTION TO DISMISS
HILLMAN, District Judge.
In this antitrust action, plaintiff, Ajax Aluminum, Inc., (Ajax) alleges that the State of Michigan, through its Department of Labor, Bureau of Community Services, together with Goodwill Industries and other defendants, entered into a conspiracy to restrain and monopolize interstate commerce in violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. More specifically, plaintiff contends that defendants have conspired to restrain and monopolize commerce in the manufacture, sale and distribution of aluminum storm…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ciminelli v. CablevisionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984