Legal Opinion
Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 16, 2000No. 99 Civ. 3658 (SHS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEIN, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION..366
BACKGROUND.367
I.Purdue’s Development of OxyContin-
II.Roxane’s of Roxicodone SR
III.The Purdue Patents.
A. The Parent Patent: The ’331 Patent
B. The ’912 Patent.
C. The ’042 Patent.
D. The ’295 Patent.
E. Terminology.
DISCUSSION 370
I. Preliminary Injunction. o Cr-CO
II. Likelihood of Success on the Merits.
A. Infringement.
1. Claim Construction.
a. General Principles.
b. Cmax and Tmax: Single versus Multiple Dosing Values ,
c. Preambles to the Claims in Suit.
2. Comparison of Roxicodone SR to the Claims in Suit.
B. Validity.
1. General Principles.
2…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Electronic Planroom, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Purdue Pharma Products L.P. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- McCaulley v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2001
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- Cacace v. Meyer Marketing (Macau Commercial Offshore) Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.