Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Tingley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1975No. 43319PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Plaintiff seeks against defendants damages arising out of the breach of an earnest money agreement, those damages being in excess of an amount stipulated in a liquidated damages clause.

The parties entered into an earnest money agreement in which the plaintiff agreed to sell residential property to the defendants. The price, originally fixed in the 'agreement at $21,500, was later reduced to $20,250 in order to conform to a Veterans Administration appraisal. Defendants deposited $50 as earnest money with the real estate broker and, subsequently, deposited $150 as additional earnest money. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tillman v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Dorward v. ILWU-PMA PENSION PLANWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Management, Inc. v. SchassbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Jenson v. RichensWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Smith v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Henderson v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Margaret H. Wayne Trust v. LipskyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bernsen v. Big Bend Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API