Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 14, 1991No. 13425-0-IIPublished

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.

If an earnest money agreement allows the seller to recover "actual damages" upon the buyer's default, are those damages limited to the difference between the purchase price set forth in the agreement and the price for which the property later sold? We hold that they are not so limited.

R.G. and Patricia Johnson signed an earnest money agreement to buy Fred and Patricia Mueller's house. The Johnsons defaulted. Five months later, the Muellers sold the house for $3,500 less than the Johnsons agreed to pay.

The Johnson earnest money agreement gave the Muellers a choice between retaining the earnest…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mahoney v. TingleyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Reiter v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. City of Bremerton v. ShreeveCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Langston v. HuffackerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API