Legal Opinion

United States v. Grosz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1996No. 94-10922PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

In this case, involving crimes of bank fraud, we primarily consider Joseph Grosz’s contention that the district court violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161-3174, by allowing 354 non-excludable days to elapse between the final disposition of Grosz’s interlocutory appeal and the filing of his motion to dismiss. The crucial question is whether the proceeding conducted four days before trial, relating to Grosz’s pending motion in limine, constituted a hearing within the meaning of the Act. We hold that the court did in fact conduct a hearing. Thus, the 354…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael O'keefe, Sr. Eric Schmidt John O'Brien Gary Bennett Paul SchmitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Alan N. ScottCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. StaulaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Tommy Ray Jackson v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Virgen-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API