Legal Opinion
United States v. Virgen-Moreno
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2001No. 98-11196PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Blas Virgen-Moreno (“Bias”), Arnulfo Anguiano-Llerenas (“Anguiano”), David Madrigal-Trujillo (“Madrigal”), and Marco Antonio Virgen-Moreno (“Marco”) (collectively, “the defendants” or “the appellants”) each appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Bias also appeals his conviction and sentence for money laundering! For the following reason, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The appellants were among twenty-eight persons indicted on drug-related charges as a result of an eight-month investigation by the Drug…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- United States v. MaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Edwin Edwards Stephen Edwards Cecil Brown Andrew Martin Bobby JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.