Legal Opinion
Hammer v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 13, 2003No. 2002-165; A122139PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Petitioners, Leroy C. Hammer and Christine L. Hammer, seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision dismissing their appeal of respondent Clackamas County’s recording of a major partition plat. We affirm.
The basic facts are undisputed, and we take them from LUBA’s opinion. The subject property is approximately 15 acres and is developed with a single-family dwelling. In November 2001, the North Clackamas County Park and Recreation District applied to partition the property into two parcels for the purpose of acquiring the northern five acres for future park and recreation land…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barnes v. City of HillsboroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Jones v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Trautman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- David Hill Development, LLC v. City of Forest GroveDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.