Conte v. City of Eugene
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeVORE, P.J.
*627Petitioner seeks judicial review after the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) denied her motion to intervene in an appeal of the City of Eugene's approval of a development application. LUBA ruled that petitioner had not "appeared" before the city during the proceedings on the application and therefore was not entitled to intervene *495before LUBA. See ORS 197.830(7)(b) (limiting "[p]ersons who may intervene" to the applicant and "[p]ersons who appeared before the local government, special district or state agency, orally or in writing"). On judicial review, petitioner argues that she "appeared" in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Warren v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Trautman v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Oakleigh-McClure Neighbors v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Century Properties, LLC v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006