Bonnell v. Bank of America
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Randall Bonnell brought this action seeking a determination of his rights to past and future benefits under the terms of a long-term disability plan sponsored by his employer, defendant Bank of America (the “bank”). Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) is the insurer and claims administrator of the plan. This matter is presently before the court on MetLife’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) and motion to strike jury demand (Doc. 12). For the reasons explained below, MetLife’s motions are granted.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bacon v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Wichita Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Neill v. NeillDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
- St. James Court Homes Association, Inc. v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026