Legal Opinion
Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 20, 2002No. 00-1021PublishedCited by 292 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
Section 4-10 of Illinois’s Health Maintenance Organization Act, 215 Ill. Comp. Stat., ch. 125, §4-10 (2000), provides recipients of health coverage by such organizations with a right to independent medical review of certain denials of benefits. The issue in this ease is whether the statute, as applied to health benefits provided by a health maintenance organization under contract with an employee welfare benefit plan, is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 88 Stat. 832, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. We hold it is not.
I
Petitioner, Rush Prudential…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by292 opinions
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
287 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.