Legal Opinion

Grimaldi v. Local No. 9

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1959No. Appeal, 298PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

Louis J. Grimaldi is the owner of, and the only barber in, a barber shop located at 1138 South 58th Street, Philadelphia. Thus, he has no employees, and at the same time he has no employer. He is a one-man operation, solely and exclusively. He opens his shop when he pleases, he closes it when it suits his will to do so. He has no labor trouble because he employs no labor. He has no dispute with an employer because, obviously, he has no employer. He is as much a one-man operation as a man on a unicycle. He has as much undisputed control over his barber shop as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. HankeSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Saveall v. DemersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Schwartz v. Laundry & Linen Supply Drivers' Union, Local 187Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Dinoffria v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  5. Pappas v. Local Joint Executive BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256California Supreme Court · 1960
  2. 1621, INC. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Lamena v. CAMDEN LOCAL NO. 396, ETC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. Millhouse, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1964
  5. E. M. W. Bar Corp. v. Hilliard, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API