Legal Opinion

Fay v. 900 North 63d Street Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1939No. Appeal, 261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an action in trespass for personal injuries received by plaintiff from a fall on the steps of an apartment house. The case was tried before Bok, J. J., without a jury. The court found in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,750.

The defendant filed exceptions to the court’s finding which were dismissed and judgment entered.

The statement of claim alleged that while plaintiff was leaving defendant’s apartment house at 12:30 A. M. on March 26, 1938, she fell on the steps of the same, and that defendant was negligent in that the ceiling light of the porch had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Stearns v. Ontario Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Cathcart v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Maltz v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Hoffner Et Ux. v. BergdollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. Hixenbaugh Et Vir. v. McCrory Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Tusnadi v. FrodleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Cannon v. BlattSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API